The Federation of Employers of Ukraine (FRU) warns that construction-materials makers face acute raw-material shortages because many deposits of refractory, cement and brick/aggregate inputs now lie in temporarily occupied areas (Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk, Luhansk). To keep plants running during reconstruction, FRU proposes two regulatory fixes.
FRU’s two proposals (at a glance)
-
Reclassify certain minerals from “national” to “local importance.”
-
Would let companies obtain special permits for small deposits (≤25 ha) or parts thereof more quickly, ensuring domestic feedstock for cement, bricks, lightweight aggregates, and related materials.
-
-
Simplify permits for drinking-groundwater extraction used for own operational needs (not commercial bottling).
-
Today’s path (special subsoil permit, pilot development, geological-economic reserve assessment, state commission approvals) can take 1.5–3 years and cost millions of hryvnias.
-
FRU suggests differentiated rules: keep full requirements for firms whose core business is water extraction, but allow industrial users to rely on special water-use permits coordinated with agencies under the State Geology Service for controlled, non-commercial usage.
-
Why it matters
-
Continuity of reconstruction: Cement, aggregates, refractories, and brick clays are foundational for housing, transport, and municipal rebuilds. Input shortages risk production stoppages and cost spikes.
-
Logistics & sovereignty: Importing bulky inputs is expensive and slow; unlocking near-site deposits cuts freight, lead times, and FX exposure.
-
SME resilience: Smaller quarries (≤25 ha) can be sanctioned faster under a local-importance regime, broadening supply beyond a few large national deposits.
-
Balanced water policy: Tailored rules for non-commercial well users preserve environmental oversight while reducing red tape for factories that simply need process or sanitary water.
Expected impact if adopted
-
Short term (0–12 months):
-
Faster access to alternative local deposits, stabilizing clinker/aggregate/brick feedstock.
-
De-bottlenecked groundwater access for plants, lowering downtime risks.
-
-
Medium term (12–24 months):
-
Cost normalization in concrete, masonry, and precast; improved bid reliability on public works.
-
More regional competition among suppliers, dampening price shocks.
-
-
Macro: Supports on-schedule delivery of recovery projects; reduces reliance on imports amid volatile logistics.
Guardrails & risks to manage
-
Environmental safeguards: Even with streamlined routes, enforce hydrogeological monitoring, abstraction caps, and post-closure remediation.
-
Local community buy-in: Clear consultation and benefit-sharing to avoid siting conflicts.
-
Quality assurance: Maintain material standards (cement chemistry, aggregate grading, brick strength) when switching deposits.
-
Transparency: Publish criteria for mineral reclassification to prevent regulatory capture.
What’s next (process cues)
-
Amend Resolution No. 827 (Dec 12, 1994) to update the lists of minerals of national vs. local importance.
-
Draft differentiated permitting rules for groundwater: a lighter track for industrial self-use, full regime for commercial extraction.
-
Define eligibility, volumes, and monitoring in secondary regulations; create a fast-track window for reconstruction-critical inputs.
For market participants
Producers & contractors
-
Map near-plant subsoil options (≤25 ha) that fit your specs; prepare baseline environmental and hydrological data to accelerate applications.
-
Build dual-source QC protocols to validate new feedstocks without disrupting production.
-
Factor reduced permit lead times into 2026–2027 capacity and pricing plans.
Developers & public clients
-
Include clauses that accept equivalent materials from newly permitted deposits if certified to standards; this supports supply flexibility.
-
Adjust tender timelines to reflect potentially improved lead times once reforms pass.
Investors
-
Watch for regional suppliers expanding capacity on reclassified deposits—particularly cement grinding, bricks, AAC, and lightweight aggregates—as near-term beneficiaries.
-
Diligence: verify permit pathway certainty, water abstraction limits, and community/licensing risks.
Bottom line
FRU’s package targets two choke points—feedstock access and process water—with pragmatic, risk-differentiated regulation. If enacted with strong environmental and transparency guardrails, it can prevent plant shutdowns, stabilize input costs, and keep Ukraine’s reconstruction on schedule.
