What happened
-
The Verkhovna Rada’s Environmental Policy Committee held its sixth and final online session to shape a consolidated draft law on packaging and packaging waste.
-
~50 participants joined (local authorities, business, NGOs), focusing on:
-
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) design and governance
-
EPR organizations (EPROs): legal status, oversight, performance targets
-
Deposit-Return System (DRS): scope, interaction with EPR, system operator model
-
-
The session was co-organized with NGO Pragma under the “Unity for the Community” project supported by the EU.
Why this matters
-
EU alignment: The draft mirrors EU packaging and waste rules, enabling future mutual recognition and smoother market access.
-
Cost-shift & efficiency: EPR moves end-of-life costs from municipalities to producers, incentivizing eco-design and recyclability.
-
Litter & landfill reduction: A nationwide DRS for beverage containers can dramatically increase return rates and cut uncontrolled dumping.
Early implementation signals
-
Kyiv region will act as a pilot for new MSW policy, tackling uncontrolled landfills and stress-testing EPR/DRS interfaces (collection, sorting, data reporting).
What’s likely next
-
Committee finalizes the consolidated text → submission to the plenary.
-
Framework + secondary rules: Targets (recycling/reuse), fee methodology, eco-modulation, reporting/verification, anti-fraud controls for DRS.
-
Market readiness: Accreditation of EPROs, tendering of DRS operator(s), clearing-house IT, labeling standards, deposit level calibration.
-
Municipal integration: Contracts for collection/sorting capacity, curbside and return-point network build-out, data-sharing.
Practical takeaways for businesses
-
Producers/importers: Prepare for producer registration, data reporting, and EPR fees with eco-modulation (lower fees for recyclable/returnable designs).
-
Beverage sector: Plan for DRS labeling, barcode/serialization readiness, and reverse-logistics via retail return points.
-
Recyclers & waste operators: Expect stable feedstock and capex signals for sorting lines, PET/HDPE reprocessing, and glass cullet.
-
Retailers: Start scoping reverse-vending and manual return points; integrate deposit handling in POS systems.
Risks & watch-outs
-
Governance & transparency: Clear rules to prevent EPRO conflicts of interest and ensure audited, public performance data.
-
Fee realism: EPR tariffs must reflect actual system costs without over- or under-recovery.
-
Phased rollout: Staggered timelines by material stream and region can reduce disruption.
Bottom line: Ukraine is locking in an EU-consistent EPR+DRS architecture. For compliant producers, this will mean new obligations—but also clearer rules, better recycling outcomes, and a more investable circular-economy market.
