...

Ukraine prepares land reform bills to close investment and toilet loopholes

by Roman Cheplyk
Thursday, April 30, 2026
2 MIN
Ukraine prepares land reform bills to close investment and toilet loopholes

Draft laws 14038 and 14039 aim to move land allocation toward auctions, public rules, and clearer limits

Ukraine is preparing two draft laws that target old corruption loopholes in land allocation. The practical goal is to make it harder to transfer valuable land through closed investment agreements or through abuse of rules linked to small real estate objects. In both cases, the reform logic is the same: less discretion, more transparent procedure, and stronger market pricing.

The so called investment scheme appeared when developers gained access to land through non public agreements with state or municipal entities instead of open competition. In that model, the land moved to construction projects on closed terms and the public side often received only a very small share of the resulting value.

What the bills are trying to change

  • Projects that fit public private partnership rules should follow that framework openly.
  • Other projects should move to land auctions instead of closed negotiations.
  • Land under small property objects should receive clearer size limits and checks.
  • Public oversight should increase because the procedure becomes more visible.

The second loophole, often called the toilet scheme, relied on a different distortion. A person could register or privatize a tiny building and then receive control over a land plot that was dozens or even thousands of times larger than the object itself. The core problem was not only abuse, but also the absence of a clear method for determining what land area should reasonably accompany the building.

The proposed answer is to define that land size through a government methodology and push any additional area into auction based allocation. That would not eliminate all corruption risk by itself, but it would narrow the easiest path for obtaining land at a non market price or without real competition.

For municipalities and the state, the economic effect could be significant. Open auctions tend to produce higher prices and clearer documentation. For investors, the result is also healthier in the long run because predictable land access rules reduce legal uncertainty even when they remove privileged shortcuts.

You will be interested